Nailed It!: How One-Shots Set Our Students Up to Fail

So I have now said to other teaching librarians on more than one occasion that I actively resist doing traditional database demonstration in my one-shot teaching and the reason for this is explored through this kind of a-ha moment I had at the end of my first semester. 

I think some important context to include is that I work at a community college in California so we’re an open admissions institution; we work with everyone at every learning level. It’s one of the things I love most about my job. 

Our one-shots in the library are mostly done for introductory classes e.g. First Year Composition & Reading, Public Speaking, Intro to PSYCH, Intro to POLSCI, etc. and tend to be about 80 minutes. Traditionally 15-20 minutes is spent on database demonstration and then students have 15-20 minutes to independently search our databases following the demonstration. Professors, who have regularly brought their students to the library for a workshop, have often required they find and select a journal article relevant to their research topic by the end of the class period. When I was hired at DVC last fall, this traditional model of one-shot instruction was passed down to me.

So I knew from my own experience using academic databases for research that this wasn’t really feasible for our students but I couldn’t pinpoint why. And then over winter break, after my first semester, it hit me. 

giphy
[Nicole Byer and Jason Mantzoukas nodding and saying ‘Oh…Okay’]
Over the break, I was bingeing the Netflix show, Nailed It! Nailed It! is a comedic competition baking show hosted by comedian Nicole Byer wherein demonstrably bad amateur bakers are tasked with creating professional quality desserts with their limited skills and time. They of course fail at this and what they do make is the source of the show’s comedy. 

Nailed It!_ How One Shots Set Our Students Up to Fail
[Netflix’s Nailed It! promotional art with messy cake]
giphy-2
[Contestant smushing a cake and saying ‘Don’t even look over here’]
As I was watching, it struck me that the premise of the show and the premise of the one-shot have a lot in common. Of course, there are some immediately apparent similarities in that both amateur bakers and amateur researchers are required to meet completely unrealistic expectations given their skill level. 

But my lightbulb moment actually came when I realized the false way that time is represented in both Nailed It! and the one-shot.

giphy-4
[Nicole Byer saying ‘God, I’m brilliant’]
Here’s what I mean…

On the TV show, contestants are given a cake model to emulate and they have 45 minutes to make, bake, frost, and ornately decorate their own cake.

  • What I know to be true from my own experience: it takes at least 25 min for a cake to bake, even longer for it to cool and you can’t effectively frost a cake that isn’t a completely cool.
  • What’s shown to suggest the impossible is possible: a heavily edited demo video that glosses the process of making this cake. 

In our one-shots, students are given a search model to emulate and they have 15 to 20 minutes to search, find, process, and select a relevant journal article. 

  • What I know to be true from my own experience: it often takes me at least an hour to select the “best” sample article in our databases relevant to my sample research topic to highlight in my lesson to them. 
  • What’s shown to suggest the impossible is possible: a heavily edited demonstration that glosses my process of searching, finding, processing, and selecting a relevant journal article.

In both instances, it’s not just that the given task is beyond the skill level although that is true. But we, both the show and I, are actually being disingenuous about the process itself.

When contestants inevitably fail or “nail it”, what they make is often hilarious…

Nailed It!_ How One Shots Set Our Students Up to Fail (1)
[Good Barbie doll cake and bad Barbie doll cake side-by-side comparison]
When our students inevitably fail or “nail it”, it’s because this model of instruction is ultimately failing them.

giphy-3
[Nicole Byer chewing and saying ‘Oh no…’]
It’s with this recognition that I have become that much more motivated to explore alternatives to traditional one-shot instruction and as a bonus, I have a useful and kind of funny analogy for how to communicate why it’s ultimately not benefiting our students.

 

This post was originally presented (with slides not GIFs) as a five minute lightning talk as part of ImmersionX at ACRL’s Immersion 2019 in August.
search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close